Home
ABOUT US
ABOUT US

Our mission

The team

Pitch us

Members’ EVENTS
TOPICS
TOPICS

Culture

Politics

Tech

Investigations

Palantir

The Harborne Receipts

columnists
columnists

Cory Doctorow

Stewart Lee

Sangita Myska

Philippa Perry

Natasha Walter

Deborah Frances-White

REGULARS
REGULARS

The Nerve Q&A

Hotlist

The Recommender

Review of the Week

Weekend Dish

OUR zine
SUBSCRIBE
LOGIN
Search
Logo
Search
  • Home
  • Posts
  • ‘History gives us the blueprint’: director Ava DuVernay on immigrants, solidarity and hope in the age of Trump

‘History gives us the blueprint’: director Ava DuVernay on immigrants, solidarity and hope in the age of Trump

The film-maker, whose compelling new documentary 14th explores a developing threat to birthright status, tells Hanna Flint that 'hands down, it's the hardest film I've ever made'

Hanna Flint
Hanna Flint

Nov 13, 2026

Film director Ava DuVernay. Photo: Atsushi ‘Jima’ Nishijima / Netflix

It was in 2023, while promoting her feature film Origin, that Ava DuVernay became fired up to pursue her next documentary project. The Bafta-winning film-maker had been watching Donald Trump's re-election campaign, where he promised to challenge birthright citizenship if elected. "It was a startling, wild and crazy thing to say, and it was picking up steam," DuVernay says on a video call from her home in Los Angeles, as she points out that Trump's manifesto point was not an empty threat. In January 2025, the President signed an executive order to end the US Constitution's 14th amendment citizenship clause, which guarantees citizenship to every person born on American soil, irrespective of parental immigration status.

DuVernay had already made 13th, her Oscar-nominated 2016 film exploring the pitfalls of the 13th amendment regarding penal labour in the US prison-industrial complex. So she gathered a team to explore the historical ins and outs of the 14th amendment, drafted and ratified in 1868 as part of Reconstruction following the civil war, with the aim of looking to the past to understand the present state of US political discourse and corruption.

The resulting film, which features names including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Equal Justice Initiative founder Bryan Stevenson, was completed only a month ago and premiered at the New York film festival, where it was acclaimed by critics as "urgent" and "galvanising”. "Hands down, it's the hardest film I've ever made," she says. "This one kicked my butt." Here she discusses her hopes for the film and the real-time events that emboldened her efforts.

L-r: Ava DuVernay and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in 14th. Photo: Ryan Postas/Netflix

It's been 10 years since the release of 13th. How did making that film inform your approach to 14th?

The thing that worked in 13th was making sure that we weren't talking above or below anyone. In both films, you could know nothing about this [subject] and come out feeling informed and not overwhelmed, or you could know a lot about this stuff and still get a refresher because it goes a bit deeper. In 13th, there's a lot of information; being able to break it up with moments in pop culture that speak to what we're talking about helps you take a mental break, so it doesn't feel like school or too dry. 

You're packing 150 years of history into 100 minutes. Tell me about the research.

Our research team was small but mighty. In 14th, there are five sections; section one has three parts, so it was an investigation trying to piece it together. For a long time, I thought we weren't going to be able to do it because it doesn't connect back elegantly. It's unruly. It's messy. The startling and sad thing about it from a reality side – but great from a film-making side – is that, late in the game, we started to see the Trump administration attack all its parts. As a storyteller, it created a very cyclical way to bring the history into the present, in ways that people really understand in the current moment.

❝

‘Facts are not political. Facts are just facts. The way that we process them, what we think about them, our opinion about them – those might be political’

Did you want the film to appeal to people on both the left and the right?

I wasn't trying to appeal to everyone. The goal was to tell the truth about the story. Facts are not political. Facts are just facts. The way that we process them, what we think about them, our opinion about them, our beliefs – those might be political. There are some facts that I thought more Republicans might be able to share to fill out that side of things. We [approached] over 300 sitting Republican representatives, senators, mayors of a major city, and governors, multiple times, but there was a blanket idea of "we will not talk to her". So I applaud the handful that did. It's for folks to take what they will from it.

Comedy can be the best way to deliver messages. I'm curious how you went about selecting clips of comedians to bolster your point?

Comedians are the last truth-tellers right now, especially here in the United States. It becomes difficult as a film-maker, an actor, or a musician, to speak your mind and not fear that you'll lose support from the big companies that put out our work. So it was interesting to track these great comedians throughout history, speaking truth to power. There aren't many that do it, so it was a small list. I'm a huge George Carlin and Paul Mooney fan, but as we looked around for more contemporary artists, we found Hasan Minhaj, Ronnie Chieng and Neal Brennan, who were speaking to parts of the film. It was fun watching all the comedy and picking the right clip.

L-r: Ava DuVernay with Carla Hayden, the sitting Librarian of Congress in Washington, January 2025. Photo: Paul Garnes / Netflix © 2026

There’s been some discussion about the AI used in the film to animate historical photos of African American people, but some people have pointed out that Alex Gibney hasn't received the same response. despite him deepfaking Elon Musk for his Musk documentary. How does that make you feel?

I'm not a defender of the technology. I think that it's destructive and unfortunate that it's embedded in so many of our film-making tools. It's in Resolve, which handles the colour for every single film that you're watching. Every editor, unless they're cutting film on an old movie, uses Avid; it's in there. So, when I go to our team of 16 traditional VFX supervisors, editors and animators, it's inside the tools. I wanted to move a camera around inside the picture, take the “Ken Burns effect” [a technique of zooming into and panning across still photographs, named after the American documentarian] even further and create a stereoscopic image with layers. I think these are tricky topics that artists are grappling with as they make and express themselves in their films. But I don't think they're all equal. Others disagree with me, and that's OK. It's a worthy conversation. I just don't want it to obscure the film that we spent two and a half years making. It feels like a bit of a distraction. 

You've said in interviews that rage with Maga is part of why you made the film. Has this been a cathartic exercise for you?

Yeah. We're in dark times, but the film shares that there have been darker times than this. We have pulled ourselves out of it when folks have understood what's in front of them – marshalled resources, talents, imagination and solidarity to stand against what tries to divide us. So I have a lot of hope.

During an onstage conversation at the London film festival, you said: "Hollywood is over." What can film-makers do to carve out a career in an industry that is getting smaller beyond reboots and intellectual property (“IP”)?

It is a time of opportunity to embrace independence, to embrace the creation of new systems and new ways of telling and sharing stories, of cultivating audiences. I see it as a time that is quite bright. To say Hollywood is over is to ask: what's next? I have tried to move in that direction through all of my work, and invite other people to do the same.

Do you have plans to return to fiction in either film or TV?

Sure. I haven't announced the next one, but I'm doing all kinds of good stuff.

Who is your hero/heroine?

My mother.

Where do you tend to have your best ideas?

In the car – LA traffic.

What would you say to someone struggling to feel optimistic right now?

Read a history book. History gives us the blueprints and the guides.

14th is in select cinemas from 27 November and on Netflix from 4 December. The Nerve is hosting an exclusive screening of the documentary for members next Thursday, 19 November, in central London followed by a Q&A with Ava DuVernay hosted by our film critic Ellen E Jones. The event is at capacity but members can join the waitlist for returns. See the code in today’s newsletter

The Nerve is a fearless, independent media title launched by five former Guardian / Observer journalists: investigative journalist Carole Cadwalladr, editors Sarah Donaldson, Jane Ferguson and Imogen Carter and creative director Lynsey Irvine. We cover culture, politics and tech, brought to you in twice weekly newsletters on Tuesdays and Fridays (sign up here). We rely on funding from our community, so please also consider joining us as a paying member. You can read more about our mission here.

Keep Reading

View more
caret-right

Home | About Us | The Team | RSS

© 2026 The Nerve.
beehiivPowered by beehiiv